On Sunday we meditated together on the cross, including Jesus’ ‘cry of dereliction’: ‘My God, my God why have you forsaken me’ (Mark 15:34, quoting Psalm 22:1). We wondered at the pain of Jesus as he experienced spiritual forsakeness by God. But what was going on here at this moment? Was Jesus abandoned by God? How much of Psalm 22 did Jesus have in mind? Are these questions even important or helpful?
Later that night at the White Horse Inn a handful of us went deeper into the Word to grapple with these questions. Here are some observations from that discussion as well as some extra thoughts after reading part of The Cross of Christ (by John Stott).

photo credit: hour of the wolf
1. When we read the whole of Psalm 22 (which I think Jesus did have in mind, given verses such as 22:15-18) we realise there is a tension for the suffering one between temporary affliction, despair and death and permanent and eternal deliverance and rescue. Verse 24 even says God has ‘not hidden his face from him’. This is not to say that verse 34 is a ‘cry of victory’ which some have suggested. Just that the verse is not necessarily implying confused and permanent despair.
2. Other passages about the cross remind us of the helping, protecting and comforting role of the Father during the experience of Jesus. These include Psalm 34:19,20:
19 A righteous man may have many troubles, but the LORD delivers him from them all; 20 he protects all his bones, not one of them will be broken.
Matthew 22:41-43:
41 He withdrew about a stone’s throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, 42 “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” 43 An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him.
1 Peter 2:23:
23 When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.
(The Father was the one whom Jesus was trusting during the cross)
3. Nevertheless, Jesus was experiencing pain from God the Father. The various words for this include ‘stricken by God’, ‘smitten by him’, ‘afflicted’ (Isa 53:4), ‘crushed’ and ‘caused to suffer’ (Isa 53:10). It seems that at this point in time the Father’s attitude towards the Son is not one of favour or approval but condemnation and wrath. ‘Forsaken’ captures this experience. We must take Jesus at his word that he was at this point forsaken by his God.
4. With this discussion we are really struggling with understanding a unique event and our own limitations in understanding God. We may well be entering the areas of paradox, where two seemingly contradictory ideas must be held at the same time. C.E.B. Cranfield says that Jesus experienced ‘not merely a felt, but a real, abandonment by his Father’ and ‘the paradox that, while this God-forsakeness was utterly real, the unity of the Blessed Trinity was even then unbroken.’ (quoted by John Stott in The Cross of Christ page 82).
Despite (or because of) the diffculties and paradoxes, there are at least two fruitful conclusions we can draw that will help us spiritually.
1. Jesus did experience genuine suffering. The cross was not an act or a sham. He really did bear the weight of all our sin and punishment. If the cross was to be genuinely atoning he must have experienced the full punishment for our sin. The word ‘forsakeness’ somehow captures this. We must be in awe of Jesus and thankful to him for suffering what we deserved. You may even like to pray a prayer of thanksgiving after reading this post.
2. The Father did not betray the Son or (ultimately) abandon him. The Father proved trustworthy, perhaps even helping Jesus through the experience of the Cross. This helps us to remember the everlasting goodness and faithfulness of God the Father. This helps us avoid pitting the Father and the Son against each other. This helps us ourselves entrust our souls to the Father.
Hope that’s helpful and that you and I continue to humbly allow ourselves to be taught and corrected in our thinking by Scripture.