In “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” on his first journey to Hogwarts, Harry opens a packet of Bertie Bott’s Every-Flavour Beans. Ron responds with a warning:
“You want to be careful with those … when they say every flavour they mean every flavour – you know, you get all the ordinary ones like chocolate and peppermint and marmalade, but then you can get spinach and liver and tripe. George reckons he had a bogey flavoured one once.”
I was reminded of this recently when I listened to Phillip Adams (Radio National) and Simon Longstaff (St James Ethics Centre) discuss on a Late Night Live program with much enthusiasm the trial of ethics classes to be run in NSW schools as an alternative to Scripture classes. At first glance this seems appealing, just like a box of every flavour beans. What could possibly be wrong with teaching our kids ethics? That’s surely a good thing isn’t it? But just as Bertie Bott’s beans can have some unpleasant surprises so too do these ethics classes.
In the discussion, it was revealed that one of the ethical situations to be presented to children is what to do in the situation where you’ve been invited to a birthday party, and accepted, and then another invitation to another party at the same time arrives. How ought you respond?
If you know the faithful and loving creator God who values fidelity, loyalty, and friendship, then the ethical resolution is straightforward and firmly founded on the rock of love and of God’s character. But for participants of these ethics classes there is no right answer other than a vague hint that if you ‘examine’ yourself and ‘think’ it through then you’ll come up with a resolution that is ‘right’, … well at least right for you.
From the discussion it is clear that the basis of ethical decision making in these classes rests on self examination – that as long as you’ve considered, and thought and reasoned enough, then the decision you make is by definition ‘ethical’. While this process may indeed result in loving behaviour, it can just as easily result in pre-meditated, self justifying, selfish behaviour.
The ethical decision making process being taught in these classes is fundamentally self-centred, if not in outcome, then certainly in process. Far from being appealing, that’s surely a bogey flavoured ethics.